This week I’ve got a massive post on picking a laptop for FL Studio (and in most ways – music production in general).

In this post I’m going to list out what are the specific requirements we’re targeting for, which laptops meet them for every price range and what you should do after getting a laptop. Time to find out what is the best laptop for FL Studio!

Without further ado.

What are we looking for?

A good place to start would be FL Studio 12 minimum requirements:

  • 2 Ghz Intel Pentium 4 / AMD Athlon 64 (or later) compatible CPU with full SSE2 support
  • 32 or 64 Bit versions of Windows 8, Windows 7, Vista, XP (with service pack 3)
  • 1 Gb or more RAM recommended
  • 1 Gb free disk space
  • Soundcard with DirectSound drivers. ASIO/ASIO2 compatible required for audio recording

Looking at these requirements it seems that any recently released laptop would be more than enough (1 GB of RAM, really?). Well… yes and no. It might be enough to launch FL Studio but it is far from what you need if you’re using VSTs and sample libraries. Apparently some known plugin libraries have significantly higher requirements than FL Studio itself.

So do these requirements actually say anything?

I’d argue that the only thing that you should take from these requirements is that video card doesn’t matter at all and hard drive space matters only if you have an extensive sample library.

FL Studio team have written a lot more sensible guide for choosing a PC but that is mostly focused on desktop/tower setup.

In sum, it seems that we need to form our own custom requirements one by one.

Let’s dive in.


The CPU is the primary factor in your ability to run FL Studio with large complex projects.Image Line Support Team

Processor is THE most important thing that comes to FL performance. You do not need to get the best product to run it smoothly but a few extra bucks for a higher-end processor will surely help.

That is what we’re targeting for.

Cores vs Threads vs Hertz

FL Studio can use multiple cores and threads. But despite that you should prioritize faster clock speed.


Each unit in the audio chain from the instrument through to the Mixer track and the effects must be processed in sequence on the same core. If one mixer track is linked to another, then all the instruments and effects on both Mixer Tracks now have a dependency and can’t be split across cores efficiently.Image Line Support Team

As it turns out, FL Studio (and you) will never balance out every single instrument through every channel without chaining multiple sends. And that causes not all the load being split equally.

That results in a peculiar case where you could run 2 instances of FL Studio both claiming to use 80% of CPU without glitching. That’s because FL Studio CPU Load doesn’t reflect usage of every core – as Task Manager does.

But how to avoid that?

Split your instruments into more channels, avoid using too many effects in the same chain. It is a lot better to split every generator into its own channel and give every channel only the essential effects they need instead of trying to balance multiple instruments in the same one.

This is especially noticeable when adding a lot of VSTs to the mastering chain. Since it comes last in the audio chain, it cannot be speed up with multiple cores. Try to keep it lean.

What does it mean for you when buying a laptop?

Your priority should be clock speed and not cores. In short – anything beyond 4 cores, at least right now, is not worth the extra money.

If I understand FL Studio correctly, this graphic should help you understand how dual core processor would handle a mixer with 5 tracks:


In this particular case, “the red core” helps out the main blue one and cuts down the time to prepare the master track by 31%, since blue one didn’t have to process Track 2, 3 and 4.

If Track 1 sends to Track 5, having extra cores will not help at all. On the other hand, if Track 5 is independent then 3rd core would speed up the process by 11% and 4th core by final 4%.

Obviously this is not a real-life scenario unless you’re making a simple beat. Usually you’ll end up using more tracks which can be processed in parallel but even then the additional gain is limited.

So which processors we’re looking for EXACTLY?

Anything in the higher range of the latest two series of processors. A higher-mid range is the Goldilocks zone for processors – not too slow and not too hot – just right.

To be sure how good a processor is I’ll use benchmarks from Notebookcheck and Passmark. Then I’ll prioritize single core priority over multi-core when comparing several models. I’d consider anything above Intel Core i7-3630QM very good. I have this processor in my own laptop for the last two years and it manages to handle ~20 generators going to ~20 mixer tracks with ~6 effects each. It can handle almost that much even without ASIO when oversampling isn’t used.

A few good processor examples:

  • Intel Core i7-4810MQ
  • Intel Core i7-4870HQ
  • Intel Core i7-4712MQ
  • Intel Core i7-4710MQ

Here’s a graphic illustrating basic selection process.


How each processor is valued, especially below that line, depends more and more on their single core performance. For that I’ll use mobile processor list sorted by their score in Cinebench x64 using 1 core.

Updated on July 28th. On social media I got a good question: “How these benchmarks scale up in real life FL Studio performance?“. I was given a personal example – a reader had a laptop with processor of ~4100 on Passmark benchmark page. And he wanted to upgrade it to a laptop having a processor with a score of ~8100. The simple question is, what performance gains would be realistic? As in, if right now the project runs at 100% – how would it run in the new laptop?

I love these types of questions as they help to apply all seemingly abstract benchmarks to clear real-life scenario. So this was my answer:

To get an answer to this I checked my FL projects from 2012 when I had a lot slower processor myself.
After doing a quick pen and paper “analysis” I saw that usually if you correctly setup your new PC, you should expect an improvement of 0.65 * benchmark ratio. That means moving from 4100 to 8100 would make your projects capped at 100% running on avg ~68%.
Though in reality it depends on how you use FL. If you use under ~15 instruments while adding a lot of effects to them then the speed boost will be smaller. If you use a lot of instruments/samples with a few effects on each of them, then the difference will be more apparent. Best example of that is master bus. If you put a lot of effects on master bus you might get a rather small improvement. And if you have your master channel clean, you could get closer to ~60%.

ASIO Drivers Support

ASIO drivers are as close to The Holy Grail in digital audio processing as it gets. They allow DAWs as FL Studio to talk directly to the sound card.

And that matters a lot.

The good new is that basically every non-edge-case laptop released in the past two years will be compatible with some kind of ASIO/ASIO II drivers, usually ASIO4ALL.

If producing music is one of your hobbies – that’s enough. If it is more than that – you should get an external audio interface. I’ll touch this topic in a bit more detail later on in the post, but for now – let’s stay on course.


Nowadays 8 GB is the new standard for RAM capacity. You can go up to 16 GB according to your budget and up to 32 GB if you’re absolutely certain that 16 GB won’t be enough. But 99% of the time it is plenty.

[…]32 Gb is only necessary if you typically use lots of sample based instruments (each running Multi-Gb orchestral libraries & ROMpler style plugins for example).Image Line Support Team

Just in case I’ll cover all my bases before getting a comment “what about memory speed/latency/dual channel?”. In this case channels won’t matter, frequency doesn’t matter and every laptop comes with CL9-11 RAM anyways.

One last thing we should consider is having extra slots for extra RAM later on. If you’re going for 8GB – that will surely come in handy if you’re planning to keep your new laptop for the long haul.

This can be a shortcut to better performance with very little additional spending (as you’ll see later on).

Hard Drive

In this case you might face a hard decision if your budget is limited.

Now here’s why.

On one hand 1TB of space can be used for a larger sample library. Meanwhile smaller SSD drives (for their cost) deliver gains in noticeable performance. This mostly improves the general experience of using a laptop and in our case – loading samples/VSTs and etc.

If you want the best of both worlds – pay the price for 1 TB SSD.

If you don’t care about extra hard drive speed – save your money for a better processor and just go for a HDD. That is completely viable since hard drive speed won’t hinder FL Studio.

If you’re on the fence, you could go for a hybrid solution which means having two hard drives – one (SSD) for Windows and FL Studio. And the second one for your samples. If SSD has 250GB+, most VSTs should fit too.

External screen ports

Working with multiple screens is a delight.

Firstly, good news! Almost every laptop has a connection for external screen, usually via HDMI.

And now the bad news. A lot of laptops under 17″ have ONLY that (and maybe VGA) connection dedicated for extra displays. You might be wondering what to do then if you want to rock out with a 2-3 external monitor setup.

Then you have 3 options:

  • Laptop with 2 HDMI connections
  • Laptop with 1 HDMI and a DVI/VGA connection
    The most common scenario which is completely OK. When dealing with graphics VGA (D-Sub) connection is inferior to others due to its lossy analog nature – at least somewhere people can agree digital is better than analog.
  • Laptop with (mini) Display Port and a multi-screen hub
  • Laptop with plenty USB connections and then buy a USB to VGA/DVI/HDMI adapter

More about external screen “hacks”

Other ports

USB has been THE mainstream port for peripherals for a long time. Finally it’s becoming a standard for external audio interfaces as well. Once a lot of devices rely on a single type of port – you’ll need a lot of them.

Look for 3 or more USB ports.

Of course a laptop needs a 3.5 mm audio jack but every single one has it. Even Apple left it intact after ditching every other port in their latest MacBook.

Sadly, FireWire is almost extinct from consumer-grade laptops. Its replacement – Thunderbolt is also found almost exclusively on Apple laptops with a few worthy exceptions I’ll mention in the suggestion section.

Battery life

Battery life requirement is entirely based on how you’re going to use the laptop. If it will be used mostly in home/studio – you can get away with a minimal battery life. Meanwhile if laptop will be your PC on-the-go – you’ll need every extra minute you can get. Nothing out of the ordinary.

Remember: advertised battery times do not represent actual time a laptop will run with FL Studio. As any other DAW, FL can be very performance hungry. Expect 1/2 – 1/3 of advertised battery time depending on a particular project and your workflow.

To keep things simple I’ll give extra points in my comparisons for laptops with good battery life.

Peace and Quiet

Working with a machine that requires a lot of power has one significant drawback – audible noise. Laptops aren’t designed to be liquid cooled (though you can try). That leaves laptops with the only other option – fans.

If you’ll want to record audio in the same room with laptop – you’ll have a problem – a few extra decibels.

Thankfully, improvements in manufacturing and the speed of integrated graphics allowed some laptops to get away without using them. This is known as fanless design. Laptops with this type of cooling (or lack of it) only started getting traction in the last year or so. Their list is expanding and probably will double in the coming year.

Sadly they are limited in performance. So please consider them only if you’re fairly certain their processors will be able to handle the load you need.

That’s why fan-cooled laptops are here to stay for at least a few more years when it comes to music production.

How to minimize fan noise?

  • When possible, opt for newer generation processors –  they tend to produce less heat
  • Coolerscooling mats, and heat shields
  • Once a year clean laptop’s fans and radiators or bring it to a person that can do it for you
    As time passes by dust accumulates within a laptop. That forces fans to spin a little bit faster and louder day after day. Not cleaning it long enough can result in your fans working at max speed and still not managing to keep temperatures within a safe range (which is usually under 212° F/100° C). Then processor is forced to slow down. This is known as CPU throttling.
    The first time I cleaned my laptop, CPU/GPU temperature dropped by 20 degrees. Which was way beyond my expectations. To do this I bought a small screwdriver set on eBay for 5$ and watched a disassembly video for my model. Though if you’re new to PC hardware – you might as well leave it to a specialist.

What doesn’t matter

Dedicated graphics card won’t help you one bit. Unless you’re using more than 3 screens or they are beyond Full HD resolution, an integrated graphics chip will be enough. Audio processing doesn’t benefit from a powerful visual engine. So if you don’t work with video/3D and don’t play new-ish 3D games – spend your dollars on a better CPU/HDD/more VSTs/etc.

It is worth noting that there have been various attempts to leverage the tremendous power of GPU to work on audio. But even in tasks that are best suited for GPU as IR reverbs – it is not a mainstream practice due to its complexity and drawbacks.

I also did not weighted a few minor things as laptop speakers as anyways even the best notebook speakers fall way too short to be used for actual sound monitoring.


To Mac or not to Mac

Will there ever be a native Apple Mac OS X release of FL Studio ? Once upon a time, the answer was no. Now the answer is probably. Never say never we suppose.Image Line Support Team

Image-line currently does not support Mac OS X. Though they are developing an OSX version which recently even had its first public Alpha release. Despite compatibility problems, a lot of artists still dare to use Mac platform for making music with FL. These are the ways how to run it on a Mac:

But until there’s a native Mac solution, trying to cram a FL Studio into a MacBook is problematic especially when trying to move from a previously PC-based setup. So proceed with your own risk.

Consumer PC laptops

Consumer laptops have reached a state where their hardware does not limit the creative process. You might still want to buy an audio interface if already don’t have one but apart from that consumer grade is no longer something professionals can laugh at.

Here I cherry picked a few best-rounded laptops paying a lot of attention to previously outlined requirements.

Just like one famous Canadian rapper, we’ll start from the bottom.

Dell i3542-6003BK

Dirty cheap option

Just to get this out of the way – this is not a serious option if you have the means to purchase a good machine. This is more of a catch-all cheap machine – best budget FL Studio laptop. It doesn’t have most of the premium bells and whistles but it is a surprisingly decent computer for its price tag. You can’t get any better for 350$ (last time I checked).

1 / 5
Intel Core i3-4030U

It is not a speedy processor but just good enough to run FL Studio with multiple VSTs and tracks (not too many though). It might be just enough for quick drafting or for creating beats. Writing songs from beginning till the end? For that you’ll need to split your workflow into many parts, rendering a lot of generated wet sounds into samples. Again, nothing impressive, but the best you can get for this price.

1 / 3
4 GB
What did you expect? This is (my) recommended minimum for FL Studio and for the price it’s OK.
1 / 4
500 GB
Plenty of space considering you won’t be able to run too many plugins/samples at the same time anyways. Hehe.
1 / 5
Meh battery, quite heavy
Battery is reported to be ~midrange. Which is good enough for 1 point in my book. Meanwhile, it weighs 5.3 lbs which is ok-ish.
3 / 5
HDMI, 1x USB 3.0, 2x USB 2.0
Nothing to complain about. It covers all the basic requirments – 1 connection for an external screen, 1 speedy USB 3.0 for external storage and 2 USB 2.0 ports for keyboard/mouse/audio interface (though why would you buy an audio interface for this particular laptop – it costs almost as much as the computer itself).
Fans and HDD
As expected.
1 / 2
15.6 HD Touchscreen
A touchscreen? That’s a nice touch (heh) which saves an otherwise below-average screen.

Well that was fun. This laptop draws a line for people with very tight budget. You can’t go below this line (minus the touchscreen).

View on Amazon

Best value laptops (~1000$)

ASUS Zenbook UX303LN-DB71T

Best value (portability)

A balanced machine which shines in all the compartments but the most important one – processing power. It is not particularly slow by any means – it still is faster than the latest Macbook Air, especially at single thread performance but it is not where this laptop excels.

2 / 5
Intel Core i7-4510U
2 / 3
12 GB
2 / 4
256 GB SSD
4 / 5
Good battery life, very light
8-hour battery life (and half of it when working with FL Studio) is a good enough result. Also it weighs only 3.2 lbs – the lowest of all laptops in the suggestion list.
4 / 5
HDMI, mini Display Port, 3x USB 3.0
HDMI and mini Display Port allows to connect at least 2 external monitors and 3 USB ports should be enough in most cases.
2 / 2
Quiet fans
This laptop also manages to be the quietest of all recommended laptops. Even MacBook Pro on 8 dB loader on max load than this Asus Zenbook.
2 / 2
13.3 IPS QHD
Great screen. Good viewing angles and well-above average resolution (2560×1440).

A great laptop if mobility is your main concern. If you’re looking for something similar but with a 15.6″ screen – look no further than ASUS N550JX-DS71T. It is a bit larger and heavier but that can be forgiven due to a high-end processor.

View on Amazon


Best value (performance)
4 / 5
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
3 / 3
16 GB
It comes with 8GB of RAM in 1 DIMM leaving the another slot free. That means we can add 8 GB extra for 45$. Neat, huh?
2 / 4
1 TB HDD, no SSD slot
Sadly there’s no additional HDD slot, but there’s a way to add more storage by removing DVD drive.
1 / 5
Average battery; average weight
A good enough battery life while the laptop weighs 5.3 lbs which is OK for a 15.6″ laptops. Anything below that would add points to the total score.
4 / 5
HDMI, mini Display Port, 3x USB 3.0
Just a single USB or Firewire port short from a perfect setup. Nevertheless, these ports will easily be enough for at least 2 external monitors, a mouse and an audio interface. You can get a USB hub for more.
2 fans and HDD
From what I found – it is a bit better than average but that’s not very impressive. So no additional points.
2 / 2
15.6 FHD IPS Touchscreen
Nothing to complain about – Full HD screen, IPS panel and a touchscreen.

A great laptop if performance is your priority.

If you’re looking for something below $1000 – HP ENVY Touchsmart 15 is a great option. It has just a bit toned down version of this laptop in most categories and comes with $200 savings.

View on Amazon

High-end laptops (1500$+)


Best FL Studio laptop for 1500$
4 / 5
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
3 / 3
16 GB
4 / 4
SSD for OS and software and 1 TB for audio library.
2 / 5
6 cell battery; surprisingly light
Only 4.2 lbs for a packed 15.6″ laptop is surprising to say the least.
5 / 5
HDMI, 2x mini Display Port, 4x USB 3.0
This setup will be let you to connect at least 3 external monitors (and more if you buy Display Port splitters and compromise on monitors’ resolution). 4 USB 3.0 ports is also more than enough for all your non-FireWire needs.
2 fans and HDD
I did not find reviews with strong feelings one way or another.
1 / 2
15.6 FHD IPS

A great workhorse with a pretty good battery and weight. Apart from that you get a high-end graphics chip and a fancy LED keyboard lighting.

View on Amazon

Apple MacBook Pro MJLT2LL/A

Fueled by hope of native release

You should’ve seen it coming. Even though there’s no support for MacBooks for FL Studio, there are ways to use it. And the prospect of a native OSX release combined with the fact that these specs would be good even for a PC machine deserves its own position in suggestion list.

5 / 5
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
3 / 3
16 GB
3 / 4
512 flash storage
4 / 5
9 hour battery; quite light
4 / 5
HDMI, 2x Thunderbolt, 2x USB 3.0
1 / 2
Silent fans
The most silent laptop while idle and 2nd while on max load.
1 / 2
15.4 Retina

Even when most Apple laptops look overpriced from PC standpoint, this model is not. Maybe because Amazon is selling it at 250 GB model’s price, almost 400$ cheaper then BestBuy.

I deliberately included this model and not the newest one from Apple. The latest MacBook has only 1 port which can be split up into a very limited number of USB/HDMI/Display Port connections. That’s why I’d still prefer this version at least until Apple releases more ways to setup multiple screens and connect more external devices. Currently connecting an audio interface leaves the MacBook without ports for external hard drive with sample library.

View on Amazon

BONUS! FireWire/Thunderbolt Edition

I said I’ll give a few great suggestions for those using FireWire hardware. Since Thunderbolt is backwards-compatible with FireWire, I’d suggest getting a Thunderbolt laptop.

You can either get ASUS ROG G751JL-DS71. This laptop comes with one empty SATA slot for a SSD. For ~100$ you could fill that slot with Samsung 850 EVO 250GB.

Important to note that the free slot is SATA 2 and not SATA 3 (which is what you need to get all the performance out of an SSD). This can be easily solved by moving main hard drive from SATA 3 to the free slot and using its’ slot for an SSD. But even if you don’t go through the trouble of switching hard drive slots, you’ll still get a visible performance boost. And don’t forget to buy a hard drive caddy and screws since most SSDs come without them. The biggest drawback for this laptop is its weight. If you want a portable ultrabook you’ll have to steer away from this 17″ beast.

A good and a much lighter alternative is a bit more expensive 15.6″ ASUS ROG G501JW-DS71. It also comes with a Thunderbolt port and a Retina-like (UHD -3840×2160) resolution. There are a few complaints that the laptop can’t keep up with this resolution while playing games and watching 2K videos, but that’s not the reason a producer would buy this computer anyways.

Custom-built music production laptops

I have found several sellers offering custom built laptops specifically for music production/DJing. In most of these machines I haven’t found much of a difference between them and general consumer laptops. One notable exception would be FireWire port which is only ever found in workstation grade laptops or Macs. If you have equipment that uses FireWire and you’ll need it for your laptop you should check out these custom solutions.

Price and performance wise none of the websites I played around with managed to beat out the consumer level laptops. Despite that, if you have very unique needs, you still should check these websites out:

Beyond the laptop

Audio interface

This can be a topic of its own but if you don’t already have one – something like Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 or something simple from M-Audio. If you’re just starting out, you don’t need an audio interface at all.

Setting up

Do not forget to clean all the useless pre-installed software that is usually added to PC laptops to maintain their prices low. Then install your FL Studio copy, move your VSTs and samples in. Finally check that you have ASIO4ALL or FL ASIO installed. If not, grab a copy. Then setup your FL settings and copy your projects to your new laptop. Happy producing!

Read if you haven’t – Optimizing FL Studio performance.

Final thoughts

I’ve showed what is important for a FL Studio laptop, what are good guidelines and which laptops are best for each price range. You might have some custom needs that are beyond this article, so adjust accordingly.

I hope this has helped you choose your next FL Studio notebook. I’ll shamefully close this post by quoting FL Studio Knowledge base:

Your grandfather used a four-track tape recorder and made albums like A Hard Days Night and Aftermath that changed the face of modern music. Even the lowliest of modern PCs will put that 4 track to shame. Limitations breed creativity, work with what you have and rejoice in the democratization of modern music production.Image Line Support Team

44 thoughts on “Ultimate guide to 5 best FL Studio laptops

  1. It should be noted that a soundcard with true ASIO (i.e. not ASIO4ALL) will give a fair performance boost since audio will be processed by the sound card and not by the CPU.

    Another useful thing if your project uses a lot of CPU is the “Switch smart disable for all plugins” macro. Although it may cause some effects (particularly some reverb modules) to cut off abruptly, it won’t affect the final exported mix and will spare CPU cycles.

  2. This is exactly the guide I’ve been looking for. I’m also looking for a good portable machine to run FL studio on. My attention has turned to the Lenovo Yoga 14. It’s a 2in1 laptop with 8gb of ram, a 1tb drive, and runs a 5th Gen i5 Processor (5570 I think). Can anybody please confirm for me if that spec would be enough for fl? I use a M-audio fast track pro currently, so externally I’m covered. But will this machine work?

    1. 5570 isn’t Intel i5 processor – it’s Xeon and those don’t come with laptops.

      I’ve found Yoga with 5200U, but that is a bit of a low-end processor for the price. I’d suggest looking for a better one or increasing your budget just enough to have Intel Core i7-5500U or better. That should be enough for light to medium usage.

  3. Good Lord, this is confusing for a mom trying to be Santa on a $500 laptop budget. The “dirty cheap” option looks a little too cheap, especially with 4gb. I’ll have to study for hours to comprehend all the techno lingo and shop around, but I don’t have the time with a demanding work schedule. Any other cheap suggestions under $500?

  4. Well mom,
    I agree the jump from a USD350 to a USD1399 is a big high. There are options in between. But maybe at a USD 500 budget you shouldn’t be looking at using FL Studio?

    I have no idea where your kids are in terms of music production, but there is other software that runs on less demanding machines and is often even better for starting producers. Have a read at this:

    Reaper (for only USD 60) is a nice programme with a step-in & step-up version. It runs on very old machines, so even the USD 350 option will take it.

    If your kids are more advanced, maybe yo buy them a good mic instead of a computer. I’m just working with a youngster, who was asking his parents for a new Macbook Pro to run FL Studio through bootcamp (Windows on Mac). Costs USD 1200-2600.

    Instead I upgraded his old MacBook PRO fro 4 to 16GB of memory, switched the CD drive for a fast SSD ( Flash) drive and bought Reaper, costs less then USD 450. And it is working as a new machine. So there are other options.

    Sorry cannot cut out all the tech.

      1. I was looking at the Asus UX-305 older version laptop and it’s processor is the Intel Core M-5Y10. The laptop is the ASUS Zenbook UX305FA-ASM1 Intel Core M-5Y10.
        Does this laptop meet the same requirements as the newest version?
        Any feedback would be very helpful.

  5. For 700 USD, that’s a great deal. Now, I can’t see the CPU spec, but knowing other Lenovo Z70 models, I’d say it has Intel Core i7-5500U. It is probably as slow as i7 processors go. That means it will work OK but you’ll need to rely on long buffers (1024+ samples in your ASIO panel) and you’ll have to limit the amount of plugins you’re using. Remember to keep your mastering chain light. Depending on your workflow, it might not be a limiting factor.

    Finally, don’t forget to use “Smart Disable” for FL Plugins – this can save you from underruns when CPU usage reaches 90%+.

    1. Only for drafting melodies and making drum tracks.

      Forget about using more than a couple of plugins. I would guess ~6 tracks, each with ~2 lightweight plugins each (EQ, linear compressor) and possibly an EQ and multi-band compressor on the master chain. And that’s assuming you’re using ASIO with largest sample sizes, no oversampling and low-medium settings on synths.

      In short, it is usable but it would be a nightmare to work on a track from start to finish.

      1. Okay, thank you. And yes i would probably guess the same thing but i thought that maybe fl studio 12 can’t be run on it, because the requirements for fl studio 12 is 2ghz processor as a minimum?

  6. Hi, does the Lenovo Thinkpad IBM T440P laptop ( Processeur : Intel Core vpro i7-4600M , 2,9 GHz up to 3,6GHz 2 core and 4 threads including an SSD hard drive and 16 RAM memory ) will be OK for a full project in FL Studio 12 ? Thanks

    1. It will be OK but you’ll be limited to some extent. It all depends on the plugin set you’ll be using.

      If you’re a heavy plugin user, you’ll soon have to raise all your ASIO buffer sizes to the maximum and you’ll possibly need to limit the quality settings in some demanding plugins like reverb.

      I’d say, it will be OK, but quite far from ideal.

  7. I just won a auction on Ebay for a Asus X501A for $124 (which I know is a bargain despite anything you might say), It has Intel Core i3-3120M (2.5GHz), it has 4GB RAM, and it has 750GB storage. I want to know if it has the requirements to run FL Studio and create a project using mainly samples.

    1. For $124 it’s a really good choice. Usually, a laptop like that would cost ~$400.

      Sadly, it’s not fast enough to work on complex projects. But if you go easy on the mix and you do not stuff plugins on the mastering chain (especially something like Ozone, multiband compressors, multiband saturators/”exciters” etc) – you should be able to work on small-to-medium-sized projects, especially if you’re working with samples and not synths.

  8. First I really appreciate this article. My boyfriend will be running FL studio on a computer I purchase him. I was going to get the Dell i3542-6003BK you recommended but will the dell inspiron 11 3000 series 2-in-1 work as well?

    Dell inspiron 11 3000 specs:
    Intel Core m3-6Y30Operating SystemWindows 10 HomeRAM4GBHard Drive Size500GB
    Hard Drive TypeSerial ATADisplay Size11.6Native Resolution1366x768Graphics CardIntel HD Graphics 515Video MemoryShared

    Thank you so much!

    1. I’m very sorry for my late answer. I feel guilty that you took the time to ask for help and I somehow missed you in my comment list. I’m not used to this amount of comments (╥﹏╥)

      Well, if that helps, I can say that Dell Inspiron 11 3000 is too slow for FL Studio. Well, at least anything above basic type of creative work. It has a very slow processor and only 4 GB of RAM which is a lot lower than recommended.

    1. No, sadly it isn’t a good option for FL Studio.
      A 15.6 inch HP Pavilion would be a great pick for just ~$700. Very solid CPU (i7-6700HQ), 8 GB of RAM and plenty of storage. Sadly, it doesn’t have an SSD but it’s impossible to have a laptop with a large SSD and a processor of the right caliber.
      Hope that helps!

    1. It will run it pretty well. Once in a while, you’ll hit its limits. But if you start with a proper ASIO setup (with generous sample sizes), and you’ll not use oversampling – i5 6400 can go a long way.

    1. Sorry, I don’t.

      Surface laptops are not ideal for FL Studio unless you need a light laptop for FL Studio in Live mode where you’re using it to perform with already rendered samples.

      But for general full-stack mixing/mastering, you’ll hit the limits with MS Surface laptops (including Surface Pro and Surface Book). Even the most expensive laptops in these lines have mid-range i7 CPUs (i7-6600U, i7-6650U), which is enough to run FL Studio, but they are significantly slower than what you could get at the same price point.

  9. I see your page is similar to my website. Do you allow guest
    posting? I can write high quality & unique content for you.
    Let me know if you are interested.

  10. I know your guide is for Laptops, but the section you wrote up on processors brought up a question. Since FL Studio seems to favor faster cores to more cores, do you think that getting the dual-core Haswell G3258 and overclocking it a bit would be a solid choice for $70?

    I am good with computers and software, I have built my own. I was considering making my boyfriend a desktop capable of running FL Studio smoothly for the holidays, as I have many of the parts necessary to do so laying around.

    I just need to purchase a small case and a processor. I have no experience with FL Studio or related software myself, except seeing that it runs flawlessly on my quad-core, overclocked gaming machine with 16gb of ram when he tried it out.

    He currently edits on a 2009 iMac that has a Core 2 Duo in Logic Pro X and has quite a few slowdowns. He said that he probably never uses more than 40 different instruments.

    Thank you!

    1. It depends on how he prefers to arrange his music. If he uses a lot of instruments (~35 is about an average you’d expect from a finished record) with very limited post-processing, more cores would be a better pick. But if he likes to use a lot of effects and routing between audio channels, getting a cheaper CPU with good performance per core is smart.

      I like your thinking – you could save quite a bit by going for the Pentium CPU.

      I’d bet G4500 (or G4400) are a bit better for their price compared to G3258 but you probably don’t have LGA 1151 w/ DDR4 RAM laying around :D G3258 is still a solid choice.

      1. Thank you Bjørn,

        I thought the G3258 would have been a unique option because of its potential to overclock, unlike all the other non-K series chips.

        I ultimately ended up building with an i3-6100 as the motherboard I was hoping to use, unfortunately, was defective.
        Luckily Microcenter had a great deal on the i3 when buying it with a motherboard, and they also had a very nice micro-atx motherboard that let me use the DDR3 ram I already had instead of buying some DDR4 ram.

  11. Hi there! Great article.
    How would you consider the i7-6700HQ vs i7-6820HQ CPU?
    Obviously 6820 has a slightly higher clock speed, but would this really make any noticeable gain in performance in a FL studio project? And would you say it’s worth the extra money?

  12. I just wanted to say thank you for this article and having this all figured out would have cost me months :)

    Still hoping for a native Mac OS X solution, but meanwhile considering buying a mini pc (not a mac mini) to work with FL Studio.

    Thanks again and have a great Christmas and New Year :))

  13. Just got a Dell Inspiron 15-5578 2-in-1 touch display with Intel i7 core, 7th gen. I don’t know how to figure out how much RAM I have because I got it as a gift and it’s brand new. Would this work with FL Studio?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *